First meeting on the theme of "scavijamento": some notes, some echo, some thoughts ... The "ice" was broken. But the road is still long.
It animates the debate over the proposal - advanced by some posters to collect signatures and public - to identify a "real and profound" epilogue of the festival. A choral epilogue, municipality, consistent with the message and example of St. Ubaldo. An initiative launched by
ceraiolo sangiorgiaro, Francesco
Pascolini (for all "Woodpecker"), who found a moment of assessment. Call it "sharing" is excessive, because the same atmosphere of the meeting, held at its headquarters Mason University - attended by representatives Families ceraioli, the Bishop and some Ceccobelli ceraioli - was not what it says its "collaborative". In fact
. The important - as the jargon - is that we speak.
What was said? I leave the story to the words of the same "woodpecker" and via e-mail informed me about the meeting - to which I would have liked to participate more, but I was not aware of, and half an hour before venutone know, frankly I do not know if or not open to the public.
But here's how he says - very briefly and frankly - the meeting, Francis Pascolini, after exposure to the initial proposal is preferred to (very politely) "distance themselves" not to affect the present:
PRESSO LA SEDE DELL’UNIVERSITA’ DEI MURATORI HA AVUTO LUOGO IL PRIMO INCONTRO UFFICIALE RELATIVO ALLA QUESTIONE “SCAVIJAMENTO SANT’UBALDO”.
L’INCONTRO E’ STATO ORGANIZZATO CELERMENTE (E CON VELATA POLEMICA: VEDI CONTENUTO DELL’INVITO) DALLA STESSA UNIVERSITA’ DEI MURATORI ANCHE E SOPRATTUTTO PERCHE’ S’E’ SENTITA "SCAVALCATA", TAGLIATA FUORI DALL’INIZIATIVA E CON QUEST’INVITO HA VOLUTO RIBADIRE IL SUO RUOLO. PRENDERE IN MANO L’INIZIATIVA (COSA OVVIAMENTE POSITIVA).
DEGLI INVITATI UFFICIALI ERANO PRESENTI:
• MOLTI ESPONENTI DEL CONSIGLIO DELL’UNIVERSITA’
• Ceccobelli ACCOMPANIED BY THE BISHOP DON MARIO ORSINI MIRKO
• Representing the town of Gubbio (AND IN LIEU OF THE MAYOR) Councillor LUCIO BOARDS
• PRESIDENTS OF FAMILIES Ceraioli
ABSENT BUT HE CALLED THE May Eugubine
THESE ARE NOT OFFICIALLY INVITED
• CAPODIECI the candle of St. Ubaldo MASSIMO MORELLI
• CAPODIECI CERO OF THE ANTHONY ROBERTO FOFI
• MARINE RED (MAYBE AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GROUP OF THE LAST SIX CAPODIECI CERO OF SAN GIORGIO)
• SOME OF THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ANTHONY CERO
SOME CURIOUS
• • THE UNDERSIGNED (INFORMED of submission, for information only)
ABSENT, BUT NOT OFFICIALLY INVITED, CAPTAINS OF THE YEAR AND CAPODIECI of St. George (the latter probably by choice)
THE ROOM WAS FULL AND THAT 'GIA' TO BE CONSIDERED A SUCCESS. Has run 'RECEIVED THE DESIRE TO BE THERE.
I HAVE ASKED TO TAKE THE FIRST WORD FOR:
ARCHIVE • SUBMIT SIGNATURES OF ACQUISITION (AND TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS NOT FANTASY)
• MAKE A STATEMENT: THE INITIATIVE IS REQUESTED BY THE SANTUBALDARI wait CERI OTHER BEFORE AND REMOVE YOUR Nothing
•
passionate EXPLAIN THE REASONS THAT PUSHED TO ACTIVATE THE INITIATIVE me from
• SUBMIT A REQUEST CLEAR
On that latter point E 'WELL DEPTH: I asked, based on a manifest shared by many, that the institutions PRESENT OR OTHERWISE INVOLVED IN a clear decision regarding this matter and assume RESPONSIBILITIES 'FOLLOW THIS DECISION.
WILL NOT 'DO NOT ACCEPT THE DECISION OF FRUIT confusion, misinterpretation, BASICALLY CHAOS. CHAOS DANGEROUS (SEE SMALL CERI 2010 TO RISS AND PLANTS, SEE ITEMS Sangiorgio PROPOSE A RETURN TO THE PAST WITH THE RAISING OF EACH A CERO SE OWN tackle injustice shaped by SANTUBALDARI MIRROR AT THE END OF THE DAY).
THE INSTITUTIONS IN CHARGE OF PARTY ORGANIZATION ALSO FREELY CHOOSE THE RULES 'for discussion and debate, but the claim is' who decides.
At that point I stepped back, I picked up the BLOCK OF SIGNATURES AND I left.
I did not want my presence to influence the debate.
IS IN CHARGE AND THAT THE INITIATIVE He had 'been obtained. THE DEBATE AND
'STARTED.
NOW OVER TO OTHERS.
remains vigilant and careful observation the evolution of events.
IF INSTITUTIONS NOT DECIDE MI FARO’ DI NUOVO AVANTI.
COMUNQUE AL DI LA’ DI TUTTO DA ORA IN POI CONTANO I FATTI. LE PAROLE NON SUPPORTATE DAI FATTI DIVENGONO ASSAI POCO INTERESSANTI.
RESTO FIDUCIOSO IN UNA POSITIVA EVOLUZIONE.
Francesco Pascolini "Picchio" Fin qui la nota di "Picchio", sulla riunione di lunedì. Riunione che si è chiusa con le parti che hanno rinviato il dibattito nelle rispettive sedi (l'Università al suo interno, così come le compagini ceraiole).
Personalmente, non avendo potuto prendere parte all'incontro - al quale per altro avrei dato il mio contributo, semplicemente ribadendo quello che non solo affermo da tempo, ma ho anche scritto nei precedenti post topic) - I tried to light information by asking other participants.
Here are some considerations that emerged in the meetings (shared or not) of which I am aware of:
The president of the Family of Santubaldari,
Ubaldo Minelli, fears that a general meeting on this issue - as requested by Pascolini with more than 760 signatures - creates a dangerous precedent that could lead to degeneration in the future (collecting signatures to overturn the party or the race) -
fear which I think is exaggerated . The risk for the future is to perpetuate the current situation only because of the inertia not have the courage to pick up the problem. The
Capodieci of St. Ubaldo,
Massimo Morelli, said he was willing to consider it only if part of a package of interventions that include other situations in its opinion, incompatible with the current moment of the party (eg St. Anthony in the fourth turn Piazza Grande).
I personally believe that everything is permissible to discuss up, even if they go without the necessary distinctions: eg, the fourth shot in the great square of St. Anthony is false invention, recent and without much substance, and could safely be abolished. Different speech on the square in giratella Oderisi (now Square San Antonio) on the site of an ancient monastery which gave its name to the course.
In any event, the Festa dei Ceri immovable has only one subject: the Patron Saint Ubaldo. Everything else - even if we call it tradition - serves as a side dish. And it is absurd that often give greater importance to outline that the homage to the patron (to return to the theme of "scavijamento" joint). The Bishop
Ceccobelli , while acknowledging its not belonging to the community that makes it compulsory for the Gubbio maintenance of a non-partisan position - he used words to share the lead Pascolini in which "there can be evil but the will to interpret Ubaldo's message. "
Maybe it lacked a clear stance that the diocese would have the authority and duty to take, talking about a gesture pointing to the Patron. Most direct place
Don Julian Salciarini , who had confided positive experience in 2000 and 2001 even in the eyes of those who (like him) tended to date for the aftermath passed in recent decades. Finally, the
Capodieci of St. Anthony, Roberto
Fofi , together with the component of Senate
Raffaele Pellegrini, explained that the basis of the problem is the historic misunderstanding to who is aware that the candle of Ubaldo only represents the protector of the art of Masons - to be distinguished clearly from the figure of St. Ubaldo Gubbio's patron saint of all and then all ceraioli. Expressions or gestures that leave even remotely suggests that the Basilica of St. Ubaldo is the only place for someone and not qualun'altro, are contrary to the tradition and meaning of the festival as well, mainly, to the meaning of the message of Ubaldo (aimed at reconciliation and not the definition of a hierarchy).
messages that it should be stressed in all forms and under all circumstances to ensure that future generations have - yes - as a dangerous precedent not specify what is behind this festival and that distinguishes it from any other event. The race is run - with its specificity (eg: there are over) but in the end the only winner is the Patron. To which he renewed the centuries-old tribute.
